{"id":236,"date":"2004-07-26T20:54:08","date_gmt":"2004-07-27T00:54:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/shermandorn.com\/wordpress\/?p=236"},"modified":"2004-07-26T20:54:08","modified_gmt":"2004-07-27T00:54:08","slug":"the-multiculturalismdiversity-tantrum","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/shermandorn.com\/?p=236","title":{"rendered":"The &#8216;multiculturalism&#8217;\/&#8217;diversity&#8217; tantrum"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>At least once a semester, at least one of my colleagues or I hear the following complaint from a student:  &#8220;I&#8217;ve heard enough about diversity and multiculturalism!!  Why can&#8217;t we just treat each other as human beings?&#8221;  I&#8217;d hazard a guess that anyone who&#8217;s taught a social-foundations course in education or other classes where this topic pops up gets a similar complaint.  It&#8217;s a minor vent\/rage against the topic itself as well as a response to disturbing views that someone might be reading.  And until recently, I didn&#8217;t understand it except as someone resisting the analysis required by the topic.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><br \/>\nAnd then, in a committee meeting this spring, when we were discussing something (I can&#8217;t remember what) and another member talked about the need for tolerance, I responded in my usual way to caution against that word&#151;probably something like &#8220;You may not be aware that I&#8217;m <strong>not<\/strong> tolerant of racism&#8221;&#151;when I felt something I usually don&#8217;t on the topic:  this small blurb of rage, a totally irrational spate of livid thoughts.  I don&#8217;t think I said much based on this, but afterwards, I realized that I was most angry at the assumption that mentioning tolerance was sufficient to paper over deep differences in power and philosophy.  I was pissed that the popular language of diversity had replicated structural-functionalist language precisely over issues that generated conflict.  &#8220;As long as you talk about it, and I tell you that I tolerate your views, that&#8217;s enough.&#8221;  Aaaiiiii!<br \/>\nAs my colleague Barbara Shircliffe has pointed out, the language of multiculturalism and diversity can be absorbed and coopted into the curriculum in a variety of ways, and this may be a reflection of its success.  Like so much other reformist language, <em>diversity<\/em> is a malleable concept.  Why do students <em>need<\/em> to learn about diversity?  Beware that word &#8220;need,&#8221; because it prompts a functionalist response&#151;to be able to fit in as an adult in different workplaces.  Now, I know that&#8217;s true, but it&#8217;s such a shallow explanation, and it shrinks the issues tied to diversity into the social psychology of the workplace.  I guess we don&#8217;t have to discuss affirmative-action policies, since you don&#8217;t need to know that to &#8220;fit in&#8221; at work.  And I guess we don&#8217;t have to discuss anything else related to public policy, either.<br \/>\nSo the next time I hear a &#8220;diversity tantrum,&#8221; I&#8217;m going to probe a bit more deeply.  Maybe it&#8217;s a healthy response to rhetorical pablum that effaces conflict.  That doesn&#8217;t mean I&#8217;m going to agree with the speaker, necessarily, but it&#8217;s another lever for discussion.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>At least once a semester, at least one of my colleagues or I hear the following complaint from a student: &#8220;I&#8217;ve heard enough about diversity and multiculturalism!! Why can&#8217;t we just treat each other as human beings?&#8221; I&#8217;d hazard a guess that anyone who&#8217;s taught a social-foundations course in education or other classes where this [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-236","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-teaching"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pag0MB-3O","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/shermandorn.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/236","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/shermandorn.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/shermandorn.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shermandorn.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shermandorn.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=236"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/shermandorn.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/236\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/shermandorn.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=236"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shermandorn.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=236"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shermandorn.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=236"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}