{"id":4382,"date":"2012-01-06T21:39:07","date_gmt":"2012-01-07T01:39:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/shermandorn.com\/wordpress\/?p=4382"},"modified":"2012-01-06T22:19:37","modified_gmt":"2012-01-07T02:19:37","slug":"the-bamboo-that-bends-is-stronger-than-the-nclb-that-resists","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/shermandorn.com\/?p=4382","title":{"rendered":"The bamboo that bends is stronger than the NCLB that resists"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Lots of stuff at the start of the weekend marking the 10th anniversary of NCLB&#8217;s signing by President George W. Bush, from <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thenation.com\/blog\/165491\/decade-no-child-left-behind\">Dana Goldstein<\/a>\u00a0(the best short summary I have read recently) to <a href=\"http:\/\/ideas.time.com\/2012\/01\/06\/in-defense-of-no-child-left-behind\/\">Andrew Rotherham<\/a>\u00a0(the best short defense) to the <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.edweek.org\/edweek\/campaign-k-12\/2012\/01\/house_gop_nclb_proposal_would.html\">public release of a draft, GOP-only bill<\/a> in the House scrapping much of NCLB&#8217;s machinery, and much more likely to come.<\/p>\n<p>Under the radar are two notable if slightly-askew perspectives, one by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.edexcellence.net\/commentary\/education-gadfly-daily\/common-core-watch\/2012\/what-the-ipod-can-teach-us-about-the-failure-of-NCLB.html\">Kathleen Porter-Magee<\/a> and another by\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/blogs\/class-struggle\/post\/stunningly-reasonable-achievement-gap-approach\/2012\/01\/04\/gIQAehgfbP_blog.html\">Jay Mathews<\/a>, each suggesting that NCLB&#8217;s rigidity was a fatal flaw. Porter-Magee argues that unlike Apple&#8217;s constant redesign of the iPod, federal policymakers carved NCLB&#8217;s provisions in stone, making it impossible to redesign iteratively. That&#8217;s not entirely true: various regulatory waivers have created options first for (awkward) growth models, differentiated accountability, and now complete escape&#8230; er, the Duncan waiver gambit. But each step has been creaky, making the whole beast more unwieldy&#8211;definitely not sleeker or more elegantly functional (so Porter-Magee&#8217;s central point holds to that extent). Mathews points to the data-intensive, blame-light approach of the former superintendent in Arlington, Virginia. Data mattered, but not as a cudgel. I&#8217;ll take that with a substantial grain of salt given it&#8217;s a short column with an appealing storyline, but both Porter-Magee and Mathews are making the case that NCLB was flawed in its rigidity.<\/p>\n<p>So what has Education Trust and its organizational allies prized most about NCLB and worried the most about in (or more properly out of) Duncan&#8217;s waivers? The rigidity. As an historian, I understand: policy structures feed political dynamics, and the evaporation of the supposed Washington consensus has to be unnerving for those who worked very hard in the 1990s to develop a coalition in favor of strict numerical targets and consequences. Those targets suffered terribly from <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Politician's_syllogism\">politician&#8217;s logic<\/a>\u00a0(as do current defenses of NCLB), and in the end the coalition was more fragile than it appeared ten years ago. Flexibility on the front end would have been a wiser strategy.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Lots of stuff at the start of the weekend marking the 10th anniversary of NCLB&#8217;s signing by President George W. Bush, from Dana Goldstein\u00a0(the best short summary I have read recently) to Andrew Rotherham\u00a0(the best short defense) to the public release of a draft, GOP-only bill in the House scrapping much of NCLB&#8217;s machinery, and [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[16,11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4382","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-accountability-frankenstein","category-education-policy"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pag0MB-18G","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/shermandorn.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4382","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/shermandorn.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/shermandorn.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shermandorn.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shermandorn.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4382"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/shermandorn.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4382\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4389,"href":"https:\/\/shermandorn.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4382\/revisions\/4389"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/shermandorn.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4382"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shermandorn.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4382"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shermandorn.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4382"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}