{"id":632,"date":"2006-07-15T08:29:16","date_gmt":"2006-07-15T12:29:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/shermandorn.com\/wordpress\/?p=632"},"modified":"2006-07-15T08:29:16","modified_gmt":"2006-07-15T12:29:16","slug":"john-kingdon-and-accountability","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/shermandorn.com\/?p=632","title":{"rendered":"John Kingdon and accountability"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>John Kingdon&#8217;s <cite>Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies<\/cite> (1984) is now a classic in political science and policy analysis, arguing that issues attain policy salience when the streams of publicly-recognized problems, policy solutions, and politics intersect. My colleagues Larry Johnson and Kathy Borman used Kingdon&#8217;s framework to analyze higher-ed politics in Florida (and the temporary absence of a statewide governing board for our universities here).<br \/>\nKingdon&#8217;s contribution to policy analysis is the framework he provides for analyzing contingency in policy creation and the adept way that his argument handles the existence of policy entrepreneurs. I&#8217;ve been trying to figure out why Kingdon&#8217;s approach still doesn&#8217;t appeal to me with long-term questions such as the shape of high-stakes accountability, and I think I have it (though I should look in the poli sci literature to see who has more sophisticated critiques): Kingdon&#8217;s framework alone cannot easily explain long-term patterns in a political system. Why doesn&#8217;t the United States have a European-like welfare state?  Theda Skocpol&#8217;s classic <cite>Protecting Soldiers and Mothers<\/cite> has plenty of contingency, but I don&#8217;t think she cited Kingdon at all. You think about problem, solution, and politics streams and &#8230; rrrrrgggggg. Nothing there on the long-term radar screen. There certainly have been policy entrepreneurs, as the new-institutionalism literature points out, but Kingdon&#8217;s analysis doesn&#8217;t necessarily point in a single direction for the long term. There&#8217;s nothing wrong in that, of course, but it&#8217;s a limitation.<br \/>\nTime to read <a href=\"http:\/\/muse.jhu.edu\/cgi-bin\/access.cgi?uri=\/journals\/journal_of_policy_history\/v016\/16.2zelizer.html\">Julian Zelizer&#8217;s 2004 article on political science and history<\/a>, I think.  There are plenty of syllabi with both Kingdon and the new institutionalists (e.g., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.uic.edu\/depts\/pols\/syllabus\/pols500fall2000.html\">a 2000 policy course syllabus at the University of Illinois at Chicago<\/a>), so I suspect the relationship between the two hasn&#8217;t been ignored.<br \/>\nPractically speaking, for me the question is the degree of contingency in the development of high-stakes accountability systems. Kingdon&#8217;s approach doesn&#8217;t quite ring true here, but I should be able to wring something useful out of it, and I can&#8217;t quite yet.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>John Kingdon&#8217;s Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies (1984) is now a classic in political science and policy analysis, arguing that issues attain policy salience when the streams of publicly-recognized problems, policy solutions, and politics intersect. My colleagues Larry Johnson and Kathy Borman used Kingdon&#8217;s framework to analyze higher-ed politics in Florida (and the temporary absence [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-632","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-accountability-frankenstein"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pag0MB-ac","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/shermandorn.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/632","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/shermandorn.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/shermandorn.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shermandorn.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shermandorn.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=632"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/shermandorn.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/632\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/shermandorn.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=632"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shermandorn.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=632"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shermandorn.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=632"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}