An immodest proposal for conference organizing

Yesterday, my 15,000 closest colleagues and I received an email from the meeting staff of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), telling us that the schedule for the April meeting would be set six weeks before the meeting itself. The meeting is five days long, and attendees with presentations currently have no idea when they’ll be obligated to be in Toronto. Meanwhile, could we please register and set up hotel reservations?

Continue reading “An immodest proposal for conference organizing”

Some curriculum vitae matters

Fall is a perfect time for grad students to brush up a vitae. This entry began as a (very long) Twitter thread in summer, but after Phoenix temperatures declined from 115 F. to 102 F., it’s time for hot cider and editing.


Continue reading “Some curriculum vitae matters”

A note on the old archive

After more than 8 years, I have deleted the old MovableType archive. You can still find them at*/

How to think clearly about that clever econometrics policy paper

A late August NBER working paper by Joshua Goodman, Oded Gurantz, and Jonathan Smith argues that if every high school student took common college admissions tests twice, that would shrink the income-relevant college enrollment gap by 20%. New York Times reporter Sahil Chinoy wrote up the story, and the headline repeated the eyebrow-raising import of the paper’s conclusion: “A Surprisingly Simple Way to Help Level the Playing Field of College Admissions.”

Chinoy quoted only one person other than the authors, and the story came out the same morning as the paper. One could be excused if the NYT story felt a bit like one of those “imminent medical breakthrough” stories about various cures that are just over the horizon. Many of those imminent breakthroughs never make it through medical trials, and one might wonder, is it really true that just taking the SAT or ACT a second time would have such a dramatic effect if every high school student did it?1

Spoiler warning: the research is clever — the paper is very clever — and yet state policymakers and those who advise them should not assume that steps to encourage test-retaking would have dramatic benefits in either equalizing enrollment across the state or boosting a state’s college enrollment.2

Continue reading “How to think clearly about that clever econometrics policy paper”


  1. The conclusion in this working paper does not suggest requiring a retake but speculates on various mechanisms to encourage retaking admissions tests. []
  2. There is a reason for this conclusion at the beginning: This blog post has been brought to you by the letter We Can Torture Finer Points of Analysis Until They Bark Like Chihuahuas. Also, my thanks to Joshua Goodman, Oded Gurantz, and Daniel Klasik for the Twitter conversation that helped clarify some things for me. []