Foolish and sensible consistencies in grading
The practical problem with reading more than 10 or 15 student exams or papers is that one has to balance the need for consistency with the need for sanity. Even with a good bit of experience and a grading scheme (or rubric, or what-have-you—a set of guidelines for grading), there is always the good chance that one’s standards will change from the beginning of a batch to the end. As a colleague tells me, sometimes the paper that you cracked down on for minor factual problems looks a lot better by the bottom of the pile. Conscientious teachers are aware of that and will reread some papers to make sure that the grading standards haven’t changed.
But the deeper grading problem is a simpler physical one: reading student work carefully is exhausting.
Exam grading
And for the next week, almost everything goes overboard while I read student work. Yesterday I had a bunch of meetings, and then the new laptop had some problems (a memory chip needed reseating), but after lunch it’s time to crack down and start reading the undergraduate exams with some discipline (of my mind).
Kentucky points the way
When I wrote “Alternatives for Florida’s Assessment and Accountability System” (available in
The pledge case
By Sherman Dorn on April 11, 2004
Like many observers of the Supreme Court, I am assuming that the court will reverse the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and rule for the school district in Elk Grove v. Newdow. If it does so by accepting the argument that the words “under God” are a form of ceremonial deism, it will be accepting […]
Posted in Random comments