Warning: Trying to access array offset on true in /home/shermand/www/www/wp-content/themes/hybrid/library/functions/styles.php on line 77

ESEA reauthorization politics, short version

With all the twists and turns in the last week, reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act is looking more like the end of the major-league regular season than deliberation, which may be a good thing considering the tales of legislation and sausage. But it’s turning my lack of commentary on specifics into a virtue. At some point in the past few months you might have believed that

  • Reauthorization was the type of bipartisan deal everyone would converge around
  • Duncan’s waiver proposal was going to push everyone towards reauthorization in summer
  • The waiver proposal was a poison pill for reauthorization
  • Reauthorization was going to be broken up into bite-sized pieces in both chambers
  • There was no chance to enshrine Race to the Top in reauthorization
  • The Harkin bill was going to hew closely to the Obama blueprint
  • etc.
And in the space of a week you get two proposals from Harkin who is obviously trying to win support from a broad range of senators on both sides of the aisle (as if that was never going to happen anyway). No, it’s not a goat rodeo, but it is unstable.